Can't Lend or Won't Lend? Beliefs and the Macroeconomics of Financial Crises
▸ Abstract
Why do financial crises cause such deep recessions, and what can policy do about them? We distinguish between financial intermediaries’ capacity to lend and their willingness to lend in a general-equilibrium model with heterogeneous intermediaries and occasionally binding leverage constraints. Two moments determine whether forward-looking intermediaries with room to lend offset constrained intermediaries’ retrenchment and dampen downturns, or cut lending and amplify them: how strongly lending responds to expected returns and how those expectations respond to aggregate shocks. We estimate both using 40 million bank forecasts of borrower default probabilities. First, comparing banks assessing the same borrower at the same time, we show that a 1 p.p. increase in expected portfolio returns raises lending by 12%. Second, expectations overreact to aggregate shocks, leaving banks excessively pessimistic following adverse news. These two moments allow the calibrated model to generate dynamics for aggregate output during crises similar to those of a model driven by balance-sheet constraints alone, but with sharply different policy implications. In a crisis, the marginal intermediary is unconstrained and cuts lending because it expects low returns. Recapitalizations provide limited stimulus, whereas loan guarantees raise expected returns directly and stimulate output four times as much at the same fiscal cost. Our estimates also explain how booms build fragility: optimism raises leverage in booms, so a larger expansion deepens the subsequent recession.